Author: Florida. Legislature. Senate. Committee on TransportationPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
An Evaluation of the Need for Legislation, Requiring the Wearing of Seat Belts
Author: Florida. Legislature. Senate. Committee on TransportationPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
Laws Requiring Seat Belts
Author: National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and OrdinancesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Book Description
A Comparative Policy Analysis of Seat Belt Laws
Author: Daniel V. McGeheePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Seat belts
Languages : en
Pages : 62
Book Description
This analysis examined data from a variety of sources to estimate the benefit of enhancing Iowa's current law to require all passengers to use seat belts. In addition to assessing Iowans' opinions about changing the law, a literature review, a legislative policy review, and analysis of Iowa crash data were completed. Currently 28 states enforce seat belt laws for all passengers. Belted passengers riding with an unbelted passenger are 2 to 5 times more likely to suffer fatal injuries in a crash relative to when all occupants are using seat belts. Iowans are highly compliant (90%-94%) with the current seat belt law for front seat occupants. Of more than 1000 Iowans surveyed, 85% said they always use a seat belt when riding in the front seat, but only 36% always do so when they ride in the back seat. The most common reasons given for not using seat belts in the back seat are forgetting to buckle up and because it is not the law. Iowans widely support strengthening Iowa's seat belt law — 62% said Iowa law should require all rear seat passengers to use seat belts. Four out of five respondents said they would use seat belts more often when sitting in the rear seat if it was the law. It is estimated rear seat fatalities would decrease about 48%, from 13 to 7 fatalities annually, if an all-passenger law was implemented in Iowa.
Proceedings
Author: Standard Enforcement Saves Lives
Author: Evaluation of Maryland, Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia's Seat Belt Law Change to Primary Enforcement
Author: Mark Geoffrey SolomonPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Buckling Up
Author: Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISBN: 0309085934
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 117
Book Description
Increasing seat belt use is one of the most effective and least costly ways of reducing the lives lost and injuries incurred on the nation's highways each year, yet about one in four drivers and front-seat passengers continues to ride unbuckled. The Transportation Research Board, in response to a congressional request for a study to examine the potential of in-vehicle technologies to increase belt use, formed a panel of 12 experts having expertise in the areas of automotive engineering, design, and regulation; traffic safety and injury prevention; human factors; survey research methods; economics; and technology education and consumer interest. This panel, named the Committee for the Safety Belt Technology Study, examined the potential benefits of technologies designed to increase belt use, determined how drivers view the acceptability of the technologies, and considered whether legislative or regulatory actions are necessary to enable their installation on passenger vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the study sponsor, funded and conducted interviews and focus groups of samples of different belt user groups to learn more about the potential effectiveness and acceptability of technologies ranging from seat belt reminder systems to more aggressive interlock systems, and provided the information collected to the study committee. The committee also supplemented its expertise by holding its second meeting in Dearborn, Michigan, where it met in proprietary sessions with several of the major automobile manufacturers, a key supplier, and a small business inventor of a shifter interlock system to learn of planned new seat belt use technologies as well as about company data concerning their effectiveness and acceptability. The committee's findings and recommendations are presented in this five-chapter report.
The Constitutionality of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws
Author: Mark L. BoozPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 56
Book Description
Low seat belt usage rates have persisted for years despite efforts to educate people about belts' benefits. There is ample documentation of the contribution of seat belts to saving lives and reducing injury. The emotional and pecuniary toll of the failure to use belts is enormous, yet of little effect in modifying people's behavior. Involuntary measures seem to be the only effective solution to the problem of misperceptions about belts' effectiveness and ingrained attitudes which resist education. Compulsory belt use laws have been successful in other countries, and since 1984 have been considered by the Department of Transportation to be a viable alternative to passive restraints. The possibility of the widespread adoption of mandatory belt use laws has again raised questions about the legitimacy of such self-protective legislation. A similar debate spawned many court cases 15-20 years ago when mandatory motorcycle helmet use laws were passed. Many of the arguments made then are relevant to the seat belt issue. The basic question remains: Are the devices effective enough and is the public interest in protecting the individual strong enough to warrant the intrusion on privacy? The answer must consider that driving takes place in a public arena. Further, studies indicate a substantial correlation between seat belt use and the protection of life and health. A case can be made for many third party effects and social costs of accidents, so this matter involves more than a mere question of the individual right of privacy. Given the traditional deference of the courts to state legislatures in the area of highway safety regulation, mandatory seat belt use laws may well pass constitutional challenges. Various legal theories support this conclusion. The right to travel is subject to reasonable regulation. A law applicable to all automobiles can hardly be described as discriminatory, thus dismissing equal protection objections. As long as there is no substantial interference with interstate travel and there are tangible "local" benefits, the flow of commerce is not impermissibly restricted. The volume of statistics supporting belts' efficacy constitute a reasonable means of serving a legitimate state interest in public health and welfare. They may well pass a more rigorous standard, and amount to a real and substantial relation between the law and its objective. The due process challenge thus being satisfied, the remaining question becomes one of a policy choice for the legislature about the desirability of this means over other alternatives.
Seat Belts, "A Good Idea But They are Too Much Bother"
Author: B. W. E. BraggPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 164
Book Description
The Impact of Legislation, Enforcement, and Sanctions on Safety Belt Use
Author: James L. NicholsPublisher: Transportation Research Board
ISBN: 0309099129
Category : Automobiles
Languages : en
Pages : 78
Book Description
Background -- Legislation -- Enforcement -- Sanctions -- Conclusions and discussions -- References -- Appendices.