Author: Darcy A. DietzPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental care
Languages : en
Pages : 348
Book Description
An Analysis of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes in Alberta Using the PAR Index and the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System
Author: Darcy A. DietzPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental care
Languages : en
Pages : 348
Book Description
Comparison of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes Between the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and the American Objective Grading System (OGS)
Author: Orfan ChalabiA Comparision Between a Graduate Orthodontic Clinical and Private Practice Treatment Outcomes Using the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and Objective Grading System
Author: Tiffany Tamiko WakiA Comparison Between University and Private Practice Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes Using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System
Author: Devon R. CookA Comparison Between a Graduate Orthodontic Clinic and Private Practice Treatment Outcomes Using the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and Objective Grading System
Author: Tiffany Tamiko WakiPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental offices
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Book Description
Assessment of Invisalign Treatment Outcome by Model Analysis Using the ABO Objective Grading System
Author: Waseem KassasPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 57
Book Description
Invisalign® is a new orthodontic treatment modality of treating malocclusion with an advanced esthetic approach. It provides an esthetic and hygienic alternative for patients who want to undergo orthodontic treatment without affecting their facial appearance. However, few studies have been published to evaluate the effectiveness of this appliance. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Invisalign treatment outcome of mild to moderate malocclusions by using the Model grading system (MGS) of the American board of orthodontics (ABO). Materials and Methods: A total of 425 Invisalign® cases were identified from an orthodontic private practice in buffalo, New York State. Of 425 cases, 119 met the inclusion criteria of having full permanent dentition with (DI) score between 10 and 20, and treated completely with Invisalign without extraction. From those 119 cases, only 31 cases had a complete set of records before and after treatment. The pre-and post-treatment models were assessed using the ABO Model Grading System (MGS) .Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the pre-and post-treatment MGS scores in all categories. Results: The mean scores of all MGS categories (except occlusal contacts score and occlusal relationship score) were improved after treatment. Significant improvements were found in OGS Score (45.03"7.47 vs. 35.87"9.36, p
Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes of Orthodontists and Non-orthodontists in Nebraska Using the PAR Index
Author: Paula L. HarreAn Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes: a Comparison of PAR and ABO Grading Methods
Author: Alene Thao LeThe American Board of Orthodontics Grading System
Author: Derek A. StraffonPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Orthodontics
Languages : en
Pages : 226
Book Description
A Comparison of Treatment Outcomes Using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System
Author: Jeffrey A. JamiesonPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Orthodontics
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Book Description
Introduction: Initial complexity (Discrepancy Index), treatment time, and treatment outcome (Objective Grading System) were compared for the four examination types of the 2007 and 2008 American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) clinical examination: Initial Certification, Final Recertification, Option 1, and Option II examinations. Methods: Retrospective study using clinical examination data for 1122 ABO clinical exam cases in which the candidate received a passing score were compared. Results: No significant findings were discovered between the four examination types for overall OGS or DI:OGS correlation. However, significant differences were found between the four examination types for overall DI, DI components (overbite, anterior, open bit, occlusion, other), OGS components (buccolingual inclination, overjet, occlusal contacts, occlusal relationship), and treatment time. Conclusions: Compared to private practitioners, cases treated by orthodontic residents had more ideal OGS scores for buccolingual inclination and less ideal OGS scores for overjet, occlusal contacts, and occlusal relationships. Treatment times vary significantly between the four examination types, with resident treatment the shortest and Option II treatment the longest. Prospective examinations (ICE and Option II) differ significantly from Retrospective examinations (Option I (First Recertification).