Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fish and game licenses
Languages : en
Pages : 32
Book Description
Additional Options for the License Limitation Alternative of Amendment 6 to the Groundfish Fishery Management Plan and Supporting Analysis Developed in Response to Public Comment
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fish and game licenses
Languages : en
Pages : 32
Book Description
Regulatory Impact/initial Flexibility Analysis of Proposed Inshore/offshore Allocation Alternatives, Amendment 18/23 to Groundfish, Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Fisheries Management Plan (FMP) and Gulf of Alaska Groundfish Fisheries Management Plan (FMP)
Author: Amendment 1 to the Tilefish Fishery Management Plan
Author: Draft Proposals for Amendment Number 7 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (Fisheries Management Plan (FMP)), Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank [MA,ME,RI,NH,CT]
![Draft Proposals for Amendment Number 7 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (Fisheries Management Plan (FMP)), Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank [MA,ME,RI,NH,CT] PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/9dM3AQAAMAAJ?fife=w80-h100)
Author: Guide to California's Marine Life Management Act
Author: Michael L. WeberPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fishery management
Languages : en
Pages : 166
Book Description
Comprehensive Annual Catch Limit (ACL) Amendment for the U.S. Caribbean
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coral fisheries
Languages : en
Pages : 406
Book Description
"The 2011 Caribbean ACL Amendment to the Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) for the Reef Fish, Spiny Lobster, Queen Conch resources and Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates in the U.S. Caribbean is intended to bring those fisheries into compliance with the 2007 revisions to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA). Actions analyzed in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) include alternatives to: 1) revise management reference points and overfished and overfishing status determination criteria; 2) implement annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures (AMs) to prevent overfishing pursuant to MSA National Standard 1 Guidelines; 3) revise management measures for aquarium trade species and conch species within the Reef Fish, Corals and Reef and Associated Plants and Invertebrates and Queen Conch FMPs; 4) establish recreational bag limits for reef fish and spiny lobster species; 5) establish exclusive economic zone sub-boundaries for purposes of applying accountability measures (AMs); and 6) establish framework procedures to facilitate future modifications to National Standard 1 harvest parameters and management measures if needed"--Executive summary (page 21).
US Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Marine resources conservation
Languages : en
Pages : 6
Book Description
Final Environmental Assessment/ Final Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Amendment 83 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 235
Book Description
"Amendment 83 would allocate the Western and Central Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod total allowable catch (TAC) limits among various gear and operational sectors. Sector allocations would limit the amount of Western and Central GOA Pacific cod that each sector is authorized to harvest. This action would reduce competition among sectors and support stability in the Pacific cod fishery. This amendment would also limit access to the Federal Pacific cod TAC fisheries prosecuted in State waters, commonly known as the 'parallel fishery', adjacent to the Western and Central GOA. This action is intended to promote community participation and provide incentives for new entrants in the jig sector. It also promotes the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the fishery management plan, and other applicable laws"--Cover letter; Portfolio comprised of three related PDF documents digitized and organized by: NOAA Office of Program Planning and Integration (PPI) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) staff.
Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan, Cape Cod Spiny Dogfish Exemption Areas
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Atlantic Coast (Mass.)
Languages : en
Pages : 107
Book Description
"The Regional Administrator (RA) of the Northeast Region of the National Marine Fisheries Service (RA) has the authority to review and approve exempted fishery requests if data show that they meet the requirements dictated by the Northeast (NE) multispecies fishery regulations (50 CFR 648.80). Representatives from the NE multispecies fleet submitted two separate exempted fishery request to the RA in December 2011, requesting that the RA consider an exempted fishery for spiny dogfish in a portion of the Gulf of Maine (GOM) and Inshore Georges Bank (GB) when fishing with gillnet, longline, and handgear (Figure 1). For an exempted fishery to be approved it must be shown, using the best available data, that the bycatch of regulated multispecies in the proposed fishery will be less than 5% of the total catch. Data from the Northeast Fisheries Observer Program (NEFOP) and at-sea monitors (ASM) were compiled and analyzed with reference to groundfish vessels using gillnet, longline, and handgear in the area requested. Upon initial review of the requested exempted fishery, it was clear that the original request would not meet the requirements for an exempted fishery. However, a large grouping of trips that were below the 5% threshold did emerge just to the east of Cape Cod, MA. Therefore, NMFS developed and considered three options, including No Action. Option 1 would allow fishing in this area from June through December for longline and gillnet gear and June through August for handgear. Option 2 analyzes an exemption for longline, gillnet, and handgear in the area year-round. Data from 2010 and 2011 show that if Option 1 is selected, it is likely that bycatch of regulated species (primarily Atlantic cod, pollock, Atlantic halibut, windowpane flounder, winter flounder, and haddock) would be below the 5% threshold for all trips that would occur under this exemption. On October 19, 2012, NMFS published a proposed rule for this action. During the public comment period, NMFS received a comment that we should consider including the portion of Cape Cod Bay south of 42° N in the exemption area. It was our initial determination that there was not enough data to exempt the area from the requirements of the NE multispecies regulations. Based on this comment, we made an additional data request to the Massachusetts Department of Marine Fisheries (MA DMF). MA DMF was able to provide some supplementary trips in the area from a historical dataset. When the area was expanded to include the portion of Cape Cod Bay west of 70° W and south of 42° 11.5' N, there were a total of 11 trips. Therefore, NMFS developed an additional alternative (Alternative 2) to create an exemption area to target spiny dogfish in this portion Cape Cod Bay. There was not sufficient data in other months of the year in this area to consider a year-round exemption. Further, there were some trips in these months that exceeded the 5% NE multispecies threshold. So a yearround option was not a viable option"--Executive summary (page 2).
Regulatory Impact Review, Environmental Assessment, Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Proposed Amendment 93 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Island Management Area
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 142
Book Description
"Amendment 93 would amend the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Amendment 80 Program to modify the criteria for forming and participating in a harvesting cooperative. This action is necessary to encourage greater participation in harvesting cooperatives, and provide for more precise total allowable catch management. This action is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Fishery Fishery Plan, and other applicable law. The Environmental Assessment did not identify any significant environmental impacts that would result from Amendment 93. The Environmental Assessment provides decision makers and the public with an evaluation of the environmental, social, and economic effects of the proposed action"--Cover letter; Portfolio comprised of three related PDF documents digitized and organized by: NOAA Office of Program Planning and Integration (PPI) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) staff.