Academic Dishonesty in Baccalaureate Nursing Students in the Midwest PDF Download

Author: Judith Russian
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cheating (Education)
Languages : en
Pages : 126

View

Book Description

Author: Daphne Dawn Bradley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cheating (Education)
Languages : en
Pages : 138

View

Book Description
Integrity is an essential characteristic of a nurse. Nurses are held to a high ethical standard in their profession. Academic dishonesty is a problem for many baccalaureate programs across the span of degrees. The literature review revealed that little to no research has been conducted in recent years on academic dishonesty in nursing programs. The purpose of this nonexperimental study is to determine the prevalence and perceptions of baccalaureate nursing students toward academic dishonesty. The hypothesis was tested using a quantitative, descriptive correlational, cross-sectional approach. The population studied were senior nursing students at four randomly chosen baccalaureate nursing programs. A survey was sent to the students at each of the schools. Topics included the student's history of cheating, acceptance of cheating, integrity of a cheater, obligation to report a peer for cheating, and the student's beliefs on the number of students that have cheated in their class. Variables included gender, age, ethnicity, GPA, employment status, marital status, and children. After analyzing the date, 27.1% admitted to at least one form of academic dishonesty, 92.2% believed it was unacceptable to cheat while in nursing school, 70.9% believed that the integrity of the future nurse would be affected, and 44% believed they had an obligation to report a peer for cheating. No correlation was found between the variables and academic dishonesty.

Author: Denise Dee Foti
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 126

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 732

View

Book Description

Author: Maureen Anne Wideman
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780494608890
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description
Academic dishonesty within postsecondary institutions is a significant issue. As such, academic dishonesty has been the subject of more than 100 studies over the last 30 years. Yet, the data provided by previous research have done little to curb the academic dishonesty problem. The purpose of the study was to describe the meaning of academic dishonesty as perceived by the nursing students at an Ontario university. Using the method of hermeneutic phenomenology, 11 students were interviewed to determine their perceptions regarding academic dishonesty within the nursing program. The interview data provided rich details of how and why students were cheating as well as descriptions of their lifeworlds. These data were reduced to determine the commonalities, themes and the overall essence of the phenomenon. This study suggested that situational factors found within their learning culture played a significant role in both why and how students in this nursing program were committing acts of academic dishonesty. The lifeworlds of the participating students had been described as being very stressful. Caring was interwoven into their learning. As such, for these students some acts of academic dishonesty were not considered cheating, but sharing. Most of the cheating was accomplished through the use of technology. They tried to manipulate, or control, their environment to ensure they could communicate and share with each other. As is found in many collectivist cultures, the students in this program demonstrated high levels of loyalty to each other, particularly within their academic groups. Cheating to benefit the individual was frowned upon, but cheating to assist others in the program was considered normal. As such, the meaning of academic dishonesty as part of the lifeworlds of these nursing students was: caring, sharing, coping and control.

Author: Kristal C. Melvin
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cheating (Education)
Languages : en
Pages : 166

View

Book Description

Author: Kari Lynn Koenig
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cheating (Education)
Languages : en
Pages : 90

View

Book Description

Author: Linda M. Krueger
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cheating (Education)
Languages : en
Pages : 173

View

Book Description

Author: Mosimotsana Jeanett Maloka
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cheating (Education)
Languages : en
Pages : 226

View

Book Description

Author: Rodney A. Arnold
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cheating (Education)
Languages : en
Pages : 398

View

Book Description
The purpose of this study was to examine the level of academic dishonesty among students at four-year colleges and universities located in the Midwest. Demographic information was also noted. Constructs of research pertaining to the study included: honor code systems, institutional size, and gender of the student. In this study, the researcher administered a researcher-designed questionnaire (Academic Honesty Questionnaire) to 695 students representing six colleges and universities randomly selected from the Midwest. Of the six institutions, three colleges and universities of differing population sizes were selected that had incorporated honor code systems. The three remaining institutions of differing sizes were considered traditional colleges and did not utilize honor code systems. The Academic Honesty Questionnaire included six subscales: perceived frequency of academic dishonesty, student reporting, personal responses, scenario assessment, reasons for cheating, and the level of academic dishonesty. The level of academic dishonesty was correlated to the presence of an honor code system to determine if possible relationships existed. In addition, the size of the institution and the gender of the student were also considered to determine if differences existed among the construct variables. Significance was found in various subscales for all six research questions. Even though no significance was found in the difference in the level of academic dishonesty between institutions with or without honor code systems, a significant difference was found in the perception of student cheating between the two types of institutions. Students from honor code institutions perceived that the amount of academic dishonesty at their institutions was lower. No significant difference was found in the level of student cheating regarding the size of the institution. However, the study found that students from the large-sized universities perceived that they were more likely to get away with cheating than students from the small and medium-sized institutions. Finally, no significant difference was found in the level of academic dishonesty regarding student gender.