A Study of Consolidation Procedures: the Ramifications and Effects on the Evergreen School District of Clark County, Washington PDF Download

Author: Harry Sidney Sutherland
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 352

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 232

View

Book Description

Author: Joseph Loren Carter
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Schools
Languages : en
Pages : 156

View

Book Description

Author: Odessa Y Mann
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 190

View

Book Description
This study explored the impact of rural school district consolidation in eastern NorthCarolina. Wilkins County is a low-income, low-performing county with an average dailymembership (ADM) of 1,501 students. This county suffers from rural population decline,decreasing ADM, and is categorized as low performing, with only two of the six schools meetingan annual growth requirement in North Carolina for the 2016-2017 school year. In 2017-2018,the six schools in this system went through planning and input sessions to implement schoolconsolidation. This case study reviews the process of consolidation one year after 2017-2018consolidation in terms of academic, financial, and community. It was determined that academicsincreased, the need for financial support increased, and the community perceived the event aspositive overall. It was also concluded that additional years of data would be needed to determinethe long-term effects. This information is valuable for other school districts that are seeking toconsolidate multiple campuses while maintaining community support.

Author: Sharif M. Shakrani
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 32

View

Book Description
As Duncomb and Yinger (2001) have stated, "School consolidation represents the most dramatic change in education governance and management in the United States in the twentieth century. Over 100,000 school districts have been eliminated through consolidation since 1938, a drop of almost 90 percent (NCES 1999, Table 90). This longstanding trend continues throughout the country, largely because consolidation is widely regarded as a way for school districts to cut costs" (p. 1). The study described in the present paper applies Duncomb and Yinger's methods to Michigan data, looking as possible to financial consequences of consolidation of school districts at the county level. Research data sets for 10 counties in Michigan are used to estimate cost-saving effects of consolidation, as in the Duncombe and Yinger study. It appears that significant savings can be achieved in consolidating school districts at the county level. The coordination of services also produces cost savings for the districts assuming participation in a county level (ISD) coordination of services. These findings are consistent with other research studies in New York and Indiana. However, consolidation studies conducted in Arizona and New Jersey indicated that the fiscal savings hoped for did not materialize to the extent expected. Overall, consolidation seems to make fiscal sense, particularly in rural and small districts. The coordination of services seems more palatable to Michigan communities and also produces significant reduction in cost of services such as transportation and operation. The results of this study should be of interest to state and local elected officials, to state education agency staff, and to public school administrators. The Future of School Districts Consolidation in Michigan is provided in an addendum. (Contains 1 footnote.) [This study was funded by the Booth Newspapers of Michigan.].

Author: Jennifer Erica Botzojorns
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 466

View

Book Description
Since the late 19th century, school district consolidation has occurred in every state. Viewed as a solution to pressures of increasing costs, declining populations, and educational inequity, small communities resist consolidation and cite a potential loss of both local control and identity. Citizen volunteers deliberate about consolidation measures in public meetings. Deliberative processes involve both emotional and rational arguments and often result in consensus. Very little research has examined the intersection of school district consolidation and deliberative decision-making processes. This study considers six municipalities in a Northeastern U.S. rural community as they engage in a yearlong process to consolidate school districts. The study examines the deliberations of a committee of 15 representative volunteer citizens engaged in creating a legal document. Observations, audio and video analysis, transcript and document review, journaling, and committee member interviews form the data. The discussions in the meetings are analyzed for the topics of educational cost, quality, and local control, and the intersection with rational discourse and emotional rhetoric. The study was designed to understand the impact of specific school district consolidation topics and emotional and rational deliberations on the meeting processes and outcomes. Findings show a disproportional amount of time spent in meetings addressing a specific town. Data concerning the town contained more emotional discourse than rational argument. The results of this study illustrate argument patterns, a heightened presence of emotional rhetoric, and disproportionate attention to one municipality. Within the meeting deliberations, members from the one municipality dissented. Additionally, on election day, the same municipality dissented while all other towns supported consolidation. The specific topics people argue about and the manner in which they do so are shown to influence a school district consolidation process. This study provides a deep look into the deliberations of a consolidation committee, and offers insight into how dissenting opinions splinter from a majority voice. It sheds light on the work of deliberative theorists and the role of rational and emotional arguments in the process. It can inform theoretical models of deliberative decision-making and the practical structures of school governance.

Author: Gregory J. Collins
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 346

View

Book Description
School district consolidation is a contentious policy debated and implemented in states across the nation. Though consolidation occurred rapidly throughout the 20th century, with the number of districts falling from over 120,000 to approximately 13,000, and several states and communities continue to mandate or incentivize it, little is known about the effects of the policy on student learning or the efficient use of the public's resources. The purpose of this dissertation is to describe recent school district consolidation in the United States and estimate the effects of one mandatory consolidation policy on student and financial outcomes. Using national and state administrative records and media reports of mergers, I counted the number of consolidations between 2000 and 2015 and examined the characteristics of affected districts. I found that one of every nine districts was part of a consolidation during this period. Most of the mergers melded a very low-enrollment rural district into a much larger neighbor, but some consolidations paired multiple high-enrollment urban districts. Consolidating districts were above-average spenders but generally carried little debt. To examine the efficiency effects of consolidation, I studied student and spending outcomes of a 2004 Arkansas law that established minimum district enrollments. From a differences-in-differences analysis, I found that graduation rates were negatively affected by consolidation while the effect on spending was negligible. Some administrative expense savings, specifically targeted by the legislation, were realized through a reduction in the number of central office personnel, but increases in transportation spending offset half of the small savings. These findings suggest that efficiency improvements should not be expected to automatically follow from school district consolidation. The results of the descriptive analysis, in conjunction with the many mandatory consolidation proposals under consideration in states across the nation, highlight the need for an acceleration of research into the effects of school district consolidation on community resources and student learning and life outcomes.

Author: California. State Commission on School Districts
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Schools
Languages : en
Pages : 68

View

Book Description

Author: Robert Joseph Ackell
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 300

View

Book Description
This mixed methods triangulation approach examined the perceptions of administrators, teachers, parents, and community residents about a consideration of a secondary school consolidation in a school district in central Pennsylvania. These groups are referred to as "stakeholders" in this study. The purpose of this research was to develop an understanding about perceptions of stakeholders regarding the potential effects of consolidating two high schools in a school district in central Pennsylvania. Specifically, this study provides school administrators with effects described by stakeholders as advantages and disadvantages. This information could be used to assist administrators and boards of education in making decisions in regard to consolidating the two high schools as a possible means of providing cost effective education. The process through which school boards and school administrators must maneuver to reach a decision must take into account several factors that are drawn from the stakeholders in the affected attendance areas. This research used the perspective of situational leadership theory and Albert Bandura's theory of self-efficacy theoretical frameworks. Data was collected through interviews and a questionnaire. A small convenience sample of stakeholders participated. This study provides background knowledge if a school district is preparing for consolidating two high schools in a School District. The findings of the study are based on the survey and interview data returned by 109 stakeholders in a school district in Central Pennsylvania. Few questions garnered complete agreement, as would be expected with a complex topic that has multiple concerns involved. Results from the initial inquiry indicated that 38.4% of stakeholders in one school district in Central Pennsylvania would approve of consolidating two high schools into one. The stakeholders acknowledged that the broader course offerings and opportunities in athletics and extra-curricular activities may be good for the students. Likewise, stakeholders stated that the school and community loyalties along with travel time were a possible disadvantage. Stakeholders recognized the possibility of less individual attention for the students and the loss of some sense of community that the two high schools provided for their home area as a concern. The primary purpose of consolidation of schools should be to enhance student achievement although schools could anticipate possible budgetary savings, as well as the overall improved student achievement due to expanded curriculum.

Author: Janet Jones Balcom
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 206

View

Book Description
In November 2007, area voters approved the consolidating of four districts into the Twin Rivers Unified School District (TRUSD) intending to create an articulated pre-K-adult urban district of 27,000 students. Since the creation of TRUSD no studies have been conducted to measure the impact of the consolidation on student achievement and related student outcomes. The important and compelling question regarding the consolidation is: Did the students of the newly formed Twin Rivers Unified School District (TRUSD) benefit from the consolidation? This research explored key areas of student outcomes and compared the available achievement, discipline, and truancy data before and after the consolidation. Student outcome data before the consolidation indicated some significant concerns, particularly in achievement. This mixed-method case study examined the impact of school district consolidation on student achievement and related student outcomes since the formation of the TRUSD. The study provided the opportunity for triangulation of multiple data sources and evidence sources, as it utilized staff interviews to drive the direction of study as well as solutions to the problem. Additionally, the research reviewed district pre and post consolidation data in the areas of student outcomes including achievement, truancy, and discipline.