A Note on the Rating of Multidimensional Factors PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Note on the Rating of Multidimensional Factors PDF full book. Access full book title A Note on the Rating of Multidimensional Factors by Joseph M. Madden. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job evaluation Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
To determine how the reliability of ratings is affected by fractionating a multidimensional rating factor, the complex job-evaluation factor, Knowledge, was split into four simpler factors: Formal Education, Special Education, On-the-Job Training, and Work Experience. Aviation cadets' ratings of 42 Air Force specialties on these four factors were somewhat more reliable than ratings on the original multidimensional Knowledge factor. Maximum reliability of rater judgments is suggested as one criterion for the most desirable level of fractionation of a complex factor.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job evaluation Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
To determine how the reliability of ratings is affected by fractionating a multidimensional rating factor, the complex job-evaluation factor, Knowledge, was split into four simpler factors: Formal Education, Special Education, On-the-Job Training, and Work Experience. Aviation cadets' ratings of 42 Air Force specialties on these four factors were somewhat more reliable than ratings on the original multidimensional Knowledge factor. Maximum reliability of rater judgments is suggested as one criterion for the most desirable level of fractionation of a complex factor.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job evaluation Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
To determine how the reliability of ratings is affected by fractionating a multidimensional rating factor, the complex job-evaluation factor, Knowledge, was split into four simpler factors: Formal Education, Special Education, On-the-Job Training, and Work Experience. Aviation cadets' ratings of 42 Air Force specialties on these four factors were somewhat more reliable than ratings on the original multidimensional Knowledge factor. Maximum reliability of rater judgments is suggested as one criterion for the most desirable level of fractionation of a complex factor.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job evaluation Languages : en Pages : 7
Book Description
To determine how the reliability of ratings is affected by fractionating a multidimensional rating factor, the complex job-evaluation factor, Knowledge, was split into four simpler factors: Formal Education, Special Education, On-the-Job Training, and Work Experience. Aviation cadets' ratings of 42 Air Force specialties on these four factors were somewhat more reliable than ratings on the original multidimensional Knowledge factor. Maximum reliability of rater judgments is suggested as one criterion for the most desirable level of fractionation of a complex factor.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 72
Book Description
"This report summarizes the history of job evaluation and gives a critical review of the technical literature as a background for the Air Force job evaluation plan. The Air Force plan is described with the rationale for each phase. A discussion of unsolved problems includes an outline of research needed to discover solutions of these problems. An Appendix lists a 200-item bibliography with abstracts." -- page iii.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 48
Book Description
Includes Abstracts of technical reports issued by the Division and its antecedent organizations; issued separately as a supplement to some vols.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 24
Book Description
Four job evaluation factors were used as the basis of rating 10 Air Force specialties. For each factor three different methods were used in constructing the scale: (1) each scale division was defined and illustrated; (2) neither scale division definitions nor examples were used; and (3) definitions were used but the examples were omitted. Ratings by samples of aviation cadets were analyzed for effects of method on mean ratings. For three of the four factors, the mean ratings obtained were not different as a function of the method of scale construction. Methods 1 and 3 were about equally reliable, both yielding more reliable means than method 2. Method 3 is suggested as being the most effective because the task of the rater is somewhat simpler than for method 1 and the reliability is higher than for method 2.
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division
Author: Defense Documentation Center (U.S.)
Author: 
Author: 
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory