A Hidden Risk of Auditor Industry Specialization PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Hidden Risk of Auditor Industry Specialization PDF full book. Access full book title A Hidden Risk of Auditor Industry Specialization by Cory A. Cassell. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Cory A. Cassell Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 47
Book Description
Using a measure of office-level industry concentration/specialization (as opposed to a market-based measure), we identify situations in which auditor industry specialization could be detrimental for audit outcomes. In stable environments, industry specialist auditors should be able to apply their unique experience and knowledge in ways that yield better audit outcomes. However, during periods of heightened industry-specific risk, specialist auditors from the affected industry could struggle to secure and allocate sufficient resources to mitigate the heightened risk in the affected industry because, by construction, specialists in the affected industry have a client portfolio that is concentrated in the affected industry (i.e., there is insufficient resource slack). We test our predictions by investigating the effects of the recent financial crisis on audits of clients from the banking industry. We find that, during the period before the financial crisis, banking auditor industry specialization is associated with higher audit quality and more timely audits. However, during the financial crisis, the results indicate that banking auditor industry specialization is associated with lower audit quality and less timely audits. Collectively, our results suggest that auditor office-level industry specialization can be detrimental in certain circumstances and that audit firms and audit regulators should consider whether the audit market, audit firms, or audit offices have become too specialized to handle the resource allocation problems that crisis situations present.
Author: Cory A. Cassell Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 47
Book Description
Using a measure of office-level industry concentration/specialization (as opposed to a market-based measure), we identify situations in which auditor industry specialization could be detrimental for audit outcomes. In stable environments, industry specialist auditors should be able to apply their unique experience and knowledge in ways that yield better audit outcomes. However, during periods of heightened industry-specific risk, specialist auditors from the affected industry could struggle to secure and allocate sufficient resources to mitigate the heightened risk in the affected industry because, by construction, specialists in the affected industry have a client portfolio that is concentrated in the affected industry (i.e., there is insufficient resource slack). We test our predictions by investigating the effects of the recent financial crisis on audits of clients from the banking industry. We find that, during the period before the financial crisis, banking auditor industry specialization is associated with higher audit quality and more timely audits. However, during the financial crisis, the results indicate that banking auditor industry specialization is associated with lower audit quality and less timely audits. Collectively, our results suggest that auditor office-level industry specialization can be detrimental in certain circumstances and that audit firms and audit regulators should consider whether the audit market, audit firms, or audit offices have become too specialized to handle the resource allocation problems that crisis situations present.
Author: Keith A. Houghton Publisher: ISBN: Category : Auditing Languages : en Pages : 34
Book Description
While auditing literature has investigated the main effect of auditor industry specialization on audit fees and planning decisions, the underlying processes explaining differential pricing between specialists and other auditors are largely unexplored. This study seeks to fill a portion of this gap by examining the interaction between auditor industry specialization and auditee risk. Using data derived from a sample of public sector audits, this study examines distinctions in how different auditors price risk. Building upon the differentiation between "premium" and "discount" specialists investigated in Houghton, Dolley, Jubb and Monroe (2000) and possibly found in DeFond, Francis and Wong (2000), the results of this study demonstrate that, in response to increased auditee risk, premium specialists price risk relatively less than other auditors. In contrast, discount specialists increase fees relatively more than other auditors. These results may reflect differences in the skill sets and work processes that underlie specialization for these two specialist sub-groups. The results are also consistent with increased competencies of premium specialist auditors in the audit of risky clients.
Author: Debra C. Jeter Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
As audit quality is paramount in returning the profession to the “priesthood” in the wake of accounting scandals such as Enron and bank failures, perhaps the most important question with respect to industry specialization is whether or not industry specialists provide truly superior quality audits. Research in industry specialization by auditors has focused to date primarily on addressing this question; the pricing of audits by specialists is a related issue also examined in a number of studies. Research suggests that specialists are associated with higher earnings quality for their auditees, whether due to intervention in the reporting process, or because management anticipates such intervention and constrains opportunistic earnings management. The role of industry specialization in audit pricing has been frequently addressed in the literature, and yet remains largely unresolved. Some studies present evidence of specialist premiums, while others find no premiums or premiums only for certain subsets of clients. In its 2003 report, the GAO expressed some concern that auditor choice was limited for large national and multinational companies requiring industry-specific expertise, noting that an auditor who audits a number of smaller companies within an industry may not have the necessary expertise to handle the larger clients in that industry. Most researchers, however, find little evidence of adverse impacts such as oligopolistic pricing as a result of the increased audit market concentration resulting from the audit firm mergers and demise of Arthur Andersen. Industry specialization, if pursued as a means of enhancing the knowledge and understanding necessary to conduct superior audits, should result in benefits to both client and auditor. Industry specialists may be able to provide higher levels of assurance because they are more likely to assess risks, and to detect financial reporting errors and irregularities, and are thus equipped to deliver better planned and more effective audits.
Author: Chris E. Hogan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Dramatic changes in recent years in the audit market suggest the timeliness of an investigation of trends in auditor concentration and an extension of prior research (e.g., Danos and Eichenseher 1982). In recent press, large audit firms have claimed that specialization is a goal of increasing importance. Peat Marwick, for example, has restructured along industry lines, claiming to be recruiting professionals for national teams of multidisciplinary experts organized to quot;focus on the same industry to serve clients optimally.quot; On the other hand, litigation concerns might prompt auditors to diversify their risks by diversifying their clientele.In this study, we examine trends in industry specialization from 1976 to 1993 and the industry factors which may affect specialization; whether market share increases are greater for audit firms classified as specialists; and whether the nation?s largest audit firms have increased their market share in the industries which they have identified as their focus industries. We find evidence that concentration levels have increased over this period, consistent with the claims of the large audit firms. We find that auditor concentration levels are high in regulated industries, in more concentrated industries and in industries experiencing rapid growth, but lower in industries with a high risk of litigation. Levels of concentration have increased over time in nonregulated industries providing evidence that scale economies or superior efficiencies of heavy-involvement auditors are not limited to regulated industries but extend to nonregulated industries as well. We also find that for the audit firms classified as market leaders at the beginning of the year, market share has increased over time, whereas market share has declined for firms with a smaller share at the beginning of the year. This suggests that there are returns to investing in specialization.
Author: Ena Rose-Green Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
In this paper, we examine the association between auditor industry specialization and the disclosure of internal control weaknesses (ICWs) by firms that filed first-time Section 404 reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Using both univariate and logistic regression analyses, we find that firms audited by industry specialist auditors are more likely to report ICWs than firms audited by non-specialist auditors. Our results therefore provide further evidence that industry specialist auditors are quality differentiated.
Author: Sarah E. Stein Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
This study examines whether auditor competencies developed through industry specialization play a role in monitoring client firms' accounting estimates. Specifically, I focus on asset impairment decisions as a key accounting estimate given managers incentives to hide these losses and the PCAOB's criticisms of auditors' testing in this area. Impairments examined in this study relate to goodwill and intangibles, other long-lived assets, and investment securities. Using the portfolio share approach to measure office-level specialization, I find that client firms engaging industry specialist auditors exhibit a greater propensity to record, and record larger, impairments relative to client firms engaging auditors with less specialization. The results also demonstrate that impairments recognized by clients of specialist auditors are more positively associated with concurrent bad news signals, suggesting that these losses are recognized on a more timely basis. Collectively, this evidence enhances our understanding of the factors affecting auditors' ability to evaluate complex accounting estimates.
Author: Cory A. Cassell
Author: Cory A. Cassell
Author: Keith A. Houghton
Author: Mark Hedin Taylor
Author: Kevin M. Raedy
Author: Debra C. Jeter
Author: Chris E. Hogan
Author: Ali R. Almutairi
Author: Ena Rose-Green
Author: Ankita Singhvi
Author: Sarah E. Stein